Ended
1
AMKAL
0 - 2
500
Full stats

0 Comments

AMKAL Scoreboard Dust II (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

18

3

0

79

5:2

3

0

6.6

-4%

16

19

8

-3

87

2:4

4

0

6.1

+3%

14

20

5

-6

67

2:2

2

1

5.7

-18%

10

17

7

-7

52

1:2

2

0

4.9

-22%

11

15

1

-4

55

0:3

3

0

4.8

-18%

Total

69

89

24

-20

339

10:13

14

1

5.6

-12%

500 Scoreboard Dust II (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

25

10

8

+15

110

3:1

7

0

8.2

+53%

20

16

4

+4

81

4:1

6

0

6.9

+24%

16

12

8

+4

76

2:4

4

1

6.3

+14%

17

16

8

+1

82

3:3

4

0

6.3

+5%

11

15

6

-4

61

1:1

3

0

5.2

-19%

Total

89

69

34

+20

411

13:10

24

1

6.6

+15%

Teams advantage Dust II (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of AMKAL vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team

500 on Dust II Analysis

500 demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for 500 on Dust II were CeRq, who contributed 25 kills, and SPELLAN, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9446 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AMKAL on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for AMKAL, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AMKAL on Dust II included nota, who contributed 18 kills, and Forester, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7802 total damage, AMKAL couldn't prevent 500 from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date