0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
65%
Ancient
58%
Nuke
55%
Anubis
52%
Dust II
43%
Mirage
37%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
4
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
65%
26
7
Ancient
58%
19
12
Nuke
55%
29
2
Anubis
52%
27
8
Dust II
43%
14
11
Mirage
63%
30
0
Vertigo
0%
1
24
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- wwlwl
Info
Map Analysis of América eSports vs Bounty Hunters by the Bo3.gg Team
Bounty Hunters on Inferno Analysis
Bounty Hunters demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Bounty Hunters on Inferno were SHOOWTiME, who contributed 19 kills, and meyern, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7885 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Bounty Hunters held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
América eSports on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for América eSports, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for América eSports on Inferno included Thuister, who contributed 22 kills, and MTGG, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7590 total damage, América eSports couldn't prevent Bounty Hunters from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, América eSports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments