0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.8
6.1
Inferno0.3
Win Rounds
16
19
Inferno3
Kills
112
110
Inferno-2
Damage
12.66K
12.19K
Inferno-468
Economy
807.85K
783.3K
Inferno-24550
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
57%
Dust II
50%
Inferno
S
47%
Nuke
45%
Mirage
33%
Vertigo
29%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
57%
7
4
Dust II
50%
10
1
Inferno
53%
15
0
Nuke
45%
11
0
Mirage
33%
3
4
Vertigo
29%
7
0
Overpass
0%
0
8
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
100%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- w
Info
Match analysis of Ambush vs Spassk Team by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Ambush and Spassk Team, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Spassk Team. The MVP of this match was SoneSb.
Spassk Team analytics
The team Spassk Team secured 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Spassk Team were Zabey contributed 24 kills and TEGBIS contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12192 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Spassk Team held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Ambush analytics
The team Ambush managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Ambush were SoneSb contributed 33 kills and SIXER contributed 26 kills. 12660 of total damage by Ambush could not prevent Spassk Team from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Ambush struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments