0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
236.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
66.121.6
Player score (round)
35611012
Damage (total/round)
38973
Player score (round)
38101012
Shots (total/round)
8516
Player score (round)
37991012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Inferno
34%
Overpass
24%
Nuke
20%
Mirage
18%
Vertigo
14%
Ancient
12%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
6
13
Inferno
69%
32
0
Overpass
57%
7
10
Nuke
33%
12
13
Mirage
60%
5
10
Vertigo
38%
21
1
Ancient
17%
12
8
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
35
Inferno
35%
17
15
Overpass
33%
9
9
Nuke
53%
30
2
Mirage
42%
31
4
Vertigo
52%
25
4
Ancient
29%
17
11
Info
Match analysis of Ambush vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Ambush and eSuba, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by eSuba. The MVP of this match was sAvana1.
eSuba analytics
The team eSuba secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for eSuba were sAvana1 contributed 55 kills and Blogg1s contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21343 overall damage.
On the defensive side, eSuba held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Ambush analytics
The team Ambush managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Ambush were SoneSb contributed 48 kills and devoduvek contributed 41 kills. 21540 of total damage by Ambush could not prevent eSuba from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Ambush struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments