0 Comments
69
51
24
+18
412
11:7
20
0
+15%
Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Records Vertigo
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
45.116.3
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.93.9
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.95.7
HE damage (avg/round)
19.43.4
AK47 kills on a map
146.6606
AK47 damage (avg/round)
63.225.3
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.13.9
USP kills on a map
31.6107
USP damage (avg/round)
18.14.7
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5629
Info
Map Analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs Young Ninjas by the Bo3.gg Team
Young Ninjas on Vertigo Analysis
Young Ninjas demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Young Ninjas on Vertigo were jocab, who contributed 21 kills, and Silence, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 7414 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Young Ninjas held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for ALTERNATE aTTaX, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Vertigo included FreeZe, who contributed 14 kills, and awzek, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5757 total damage, ALTERNATE aTTaX couldn't prevent Young Ninjas from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments