0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
67%
Mirage
54%
Vertigo
53%
Inferno
42%
Overpass
11%
Ancient
8%
Anubis
2%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
75
Mirage
54%
24
38
Vertigo
53%
15
28
Inferno
59%
37
7
Overpass
61%
51
1
Ancient
42%
50
24
Anubis
65%
49
3
Last 5 maps
Nuke
33%
3
0
Mirage
0%
1
2
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Inferno
17%
6
0
Overpass
50%
4
1
Ancient
50%
10
0
Anubis
63%
8
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwww
- lllwl
Info
Map Analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs TUSTE CHOPAKI by the Bo3.gg Team
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Anubis Analysis
ALTERNATE aTTaX demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Anubis were PANIX, who contributed 19 kills, and FreeZe, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7479 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, ALTERNATE aTTaX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
TUSTE CHOPAKI on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for TUSTE CHOPAKI, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for TUSTE CHOPAKI on Anubis included GruBy, who contributed 11 kills, and pawkoem, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5580 total damage, TUSTE CHOPAKI couldn't prevent ALTERNATE aTTaX from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, TUSTE CHOPAKI struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments