0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
52%
Ancient
39%
Inferno
14%
Mirage
13%
Anubis
9%
Dust II
2%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
52%
21
9
Ancient
39%
36
18
Inferno
58%
38
1
Mirage
42%
19
30
Anubis
52%
62
0
Dust II
58%
24
4
Nuke
0%
6
34
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Inferno
44%
9
0
Mirage
29%
7
0
Anubis
43%
7
0
Dust II
56%
9
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlww
- wlwwl
Info
Map Analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs PCIFIC Esport by the Bo3.gg Team
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno Analysis
ALTERNATE aTTaX demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno were PerX, who contributed 17 kills, and prosus, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8009 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, ALTERNATE aTTaX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
PCIFIC Esport on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for PCIFIC Esport, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for PCIFIC Esport on Inferno included lugseN, who contributed 15 kills, and Cizzx, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6606 total damage, PCIFIC Esport couldn't prevent ALTERNATE aTTaX from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, PCIFIC Esport struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments