Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
44%
Nuke
33%
Anubis
25%
Inferno
17%
Ancient
7%
Vertigo
6%
Dust II
1%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
23%
26
34
Nuke
0%
5
47
Anubis
48%
56
1
Inferno
61%
38
3
Ancient
36%
42
24
Vertigo
54%
35
9
Dust II
44%
9
5
Last 5 maps
Mirage
67%
15
2
Nuke
33%
6
14
Anubis
73%
41
2
Inferno
44%
9
15
Ancient
43%
23
1
Vertigo
48%
21
4
Dust II
45%
11
11
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlww
- wwlww
Info
Map Analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team
CYBERSHOKE on Vertigo Analysis
CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Vertigo were levantino, who contributed 17 kills, and sstiNiX, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 9293 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for ALTERNATE aTTaX, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Vertigo included hyped, who contributed 22 kills, and PerX, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8587 total damage, ALTERNATE aTTaX couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments