0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
46%
Mirage
45%
Ancient
31%
Overpass
25%
Dust II
12%
Inferno
10%
Vertigo
2%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
12
Mirage
30%
10
5
Ancient
31%
16
1
Overpass
65%
20
3
Dust II
62%
21
1
Inferno
60%
25
1
Vertigo
65%
23
7
Last 5 maps
Nuke
54%
13
1
Mirage
75%
28
0
Ancient
0%
2
10
Overpass
40%
15
4
Dust II
50%
14
0
Inferno
50%
16
4
Vertigo
67%
3
8
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- wwwlw
Info
Match analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs Budapest Five by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ALTERNATE aTTaX and Budapest Five, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Budapest Five. The MVP of this match was EspiranTo.
Budapest Five analytics
The team Budapest Five secured 0 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Budapest Five were EspiranTo contributed 34 kills and Chill contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11530 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Budapest Five held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ALTERNATE aTTaX analytics
The team ALTERNATE aTTaX managed to secure 30 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX were awzek contributed 25 kills and PerX contributed 24 kills. 11193 of total damage by ALTERNATE aTTaX could not prevent Budapest Five from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments