0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
45773
Player score (round)
43511010
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
42261010
Player's aces
1
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
36%
Ancient
24%
Nuke
17%
Inferno
16%
Dust II
15%
Anubis
6%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
36%
25
35
Ancient
37%
43
24
Nuke
0%
6
43
Inferno
55%
47
1
Dust II
58%
24
5
Anubis
52%
71
0
Vertigo
47%
30
9
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
5
Ancient
13%
15
3
Nuke
17%
6
2
Inferno
39%
18
0
Dust II
43%
14
0
Anubis
46%
28
0
Vertigo
44%
18
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- lllll
Info
Match analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs ADEPTS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ALTERNATE aTTaX and ADEPTS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by ADEPTS. The MVP of this match was HippoV.
ADEPTS analytics
The team ADEPTS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ADEPTS were HippoV contributed 16 kills and cHeuuuuk contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8618 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ADEPTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ALTERNATE aTTaX analytics
The team ALTERNATE aTTaX managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX were hyped contributed 18 kills and PerX contributed 13 kills. 6989 of total damage by ALTERNATE aTTaX could not prevent ADEPTS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments