0 Comments
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
A
100%
Nuke
A
100%
Ancient
B
100%
Anubis
B
100%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
0
Nuke
100%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Mirage
0%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
100%
2
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- lwllw
Info
Map Analysis of Alter Iron Club vs BACKWHENEVER by the Bo3.gg Team
Alter Iron Club on Dust II Analysis
Alter Iron Club demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Alter Iron Club on Dust II were Talen, who contributed 23 kills, and mishani, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9253 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Alter Iron Club held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
BACKWHENEVER on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for BACKWHENEVER, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for BACKWHENEVER on Dust II included shade, who contributed 26 kills, and tizzyP, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8749 total damage, BACKWHENEVER couldn't prevent Alter Iron Club from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, BACKWHENEVER struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments