ALASKA Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

11

3

0

70

1:1

4

0

6.2

+10%

10

12

3

-2

79

0:3

2

1

6.1

-4%

6

13

1

-7

44

0:4

1

0

3.9

-32%

4

13

1

-9

55

0:3

1

0

3.8

-35%

2

13

3

-11

27

0:2

0

0

2.9

-58%

Total

33

62

11

-29

275

1:13

8

1

4.6

-24%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

5

3

+15

111

6:0

6

0

9.4

+71%

14

5

4

+9

120

1:0

4

0

8.2

+44%

14

8

0

+6

85

4:0

4

0

7.4

+30%

8

8

4

0

82

2:0

0

0

6.2

+3%

6

7

7

-1

64

0:1

1

1

5.6

+1%

Total

62

33

18

+29

462

13:1

15

1

7.4

+30%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of ALASKA vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 11 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were simke, who contributed 20 kills, and nEMANHA, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6463 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ALASKA on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ALASKA, as they managed to secure 3 out of 14 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ALASKA on Inferno included Rezst, who contributed 11 kills, and Girafffe, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3849 total damage, ALASKA couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, ALASKA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date