0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
116.2912
AK47 kills on a map
96.3792
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4531
USP kills on a map
31.5972
Kills on a map
2116.6028
Deaths on a map
1.9516.7502
Damage (avg/round)
136.91834.8
Speed Round (sec)
00:17s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Train
50%
Mirage
48%
Dust II
25%
Anubis
18%
Inferno
2%
Nuke
2%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Train
25%
8
2
Mirage
0%
2
11
Dust II
0%
1
9
Anubis
25%
8
1
Inferno
43%
7
5
Nuke
50%
6
0
Ancient
58%
12
0
Last 5 maps
Train
75%
4
5
Mirage
48%
33
4
Dust II
25%
4
31
Anubis
43%
23
13
Inferno
45%
20
7
Nuke
48%
46
2
Ancient
58%
79
0
Info
Match analysis of ALASKA vs WOPA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ALASKA and WOPA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by ALASKA. The MVP of this match was arTisT.
ALASKA analytics
The team ALASKA secured 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ALASKA were arTisT contributed 21 kills and Girafffe contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7047 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ALASKA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
WOPA analytics
The team WOPA managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for WOPA were PR1mE contributed 7 kills and Gnøffe contributed 6 kills. 4187 of total damage by WOPA could not prevent ALASKA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, WOPA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments