AGO Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

22

3

+1

96

5:5

7

1

6.7

+8%

18

19

4

-1

66

4:2

4

1

6.1

+7%

21

20

2

+1

71

2:2

6

0

5.8

+2%

15

19

5

-4

56

1:2

4

1

5.3

-19%

13

23

1

-10

43

3:4

2

0

4.5

-30%

Total

90

103

15

-13

331

15:15

23

3

5.7

-6%

Wisla Krakow Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

16

5

+13

107

2:2

8

0

7.6

+29%

26

17

3

+9

85

4:2

8

0

7.1

+23%

23

21

5

+2

87

5:3

5

0

6.8

+4%

15

19

5

-4

63

3:4

4

1

5.2

-8%

9

18

4

-9

48

1:4

1

0

4.5

-27%

Total

102

91

22

+11

389

15:15

26

1

6.2

+4%

Teams advantage Nuke (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of AGO vs Wisla Krakow by the Bo3.gg Team

Wisla Krakow on Nuke Analysis

Wisla Krakow demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Wisla Krakow on Nuke were Goofy, who contributed 29 kills, and SZPERO, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 11669 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Wisla Krakow held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AGO on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for AGO, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AGO on Nuke included F1KU, who contributed 23 kills, and Grashog, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9938 total damage, AGO couldn't prevent Wisla Krakow from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, AGO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date