0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
12.33.4
USP kills on a map
41.616
USP damage (avg/round)
16.64.6
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:30s00:39s
Shots (total/round)
8316
Shots (total/round)
8616
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
HE damage (total/round)
9926.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
71%
Vertigo
46%
Overpass
38%
Inferno
31%
Mirage
23%
Nuke
6%
Dust II
3%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
71%
14
0
Vertigo
46%
13
12
Overpass
0%
0
33
Inferno
60%
10
9
Mirage
67%
15
2
Nuke
56%
16
6
Dust II
47%
15
8
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
3
Vertigo
0%
2
6
Overpass
38%
8
0
Inferno
29%
7
3
Mirage
44%
9
2
Nuke
50%
4
1
Dust II
50%
4
2
Info
Match analysis of AGO vs SJ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AGO and SJ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Vertigo, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was snatchie.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were snatchie contributed 43 kills and rallen contributed 31 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18816 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SJ analytics
The team SJ managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SJ were Jelo contributed 32 kills and arvid contributed 29 kills. 14673 of total damage by SJ could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SJ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments