Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
61.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
18.45.4
Player score (round)
37071012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
39%
Overpass
36%
Nuke
30%
Inferno
24%
Ancient
11%
Dust II
5%
Vertigo
5%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
39%
18
1
Overpass
0%
0
29
Nuke
23%
13
10
Inferno
40%
15
14
Ancient
55%
20
2
Dust II
40%
15
5
Vertigo
47%
17
2
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
19
Overpass
36%
11
8
Nuke
53%
19
2
Inferno
64%
22
4
Ancient
44%
16
6
Dust II
35%
17
7
Vertigo
42%
19
1
Info
Match analysis of AGO vs PACT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AGO and PACT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was Bielany.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 43 out of 83 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were leman contributed 62 kills and kRaSnaL contributed 56 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31675 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 24 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PACT analytics
The team PACT managed to secure 39 out of 83 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PACT were Bielany contributed 66 kills and Reatz contributed 63 kills. 30526 of total damage by PACT could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PACT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 25 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments