Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
11.33.4
USP damage (avg/round)
14.74.6
Smoke thrown on a map
3015.0371
Shots (total/round)
9716
Shots (total/round)
9316
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
HE damage (total/round)
13526.8
HE damage (total/round)
11126.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
70%
Dust II
38%
Nuke
32%
Mirage
18%
Vertigo
17%
Inferno
10%
Ancient
8%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
31
Dust II
38%
16
5
Nuke
23%
13
12
Mirage
35%
20
1
Vertigo
50%
18
2
Inferno
40%
15
14
Ancient
59%
22
2
Last 5 maps
Overpass
70%
10
7
Dust II
0%
0
12
Nuke
55%
11
1
Mirage
53%
19
1
Vertigo
33%
12
2
Inferno
50%
20
3
Ancient
67%
3
7
Info
Match analysis of AGO vs ONYX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AGO and ONYX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was ultimate.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 51 out of 98 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Ancient. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were ultimate contributed 84 kills and kRaSnaL contributed 65 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 34804 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 29 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ONYX analytics
The team ONYX managed to secure 47 out of 98 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ONYX were bodito contributed 69 kills and msN contributed 69 kills. 35342 of total damage by ONYX could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ONYX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 27 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments