AGO Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

12

9

+13

114

4:0

6

1

8.6

+28%

20

12

2

+8

81

3:1

5

1

6.9

+13%

23

13

1

+10

92

2:4

5

0

6.8

+24%

19

14

5

+5

94

1:2

4

0

6.6

+21%

17

14

7

+3

85

3:3

3

0

6.4

+16%

Total

104

65

24

+39

466

13:10

23

2

7.1

+20%

Izako Boars Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

20

1

-4

79

0:2

4

1

5.8

-14%

14

20

1

-6

72

2:2

3

1

5.8

-6%

12

21

5

-9

64

0:0

1

1

5.5

-13%

13

21

1

-8

60

6:6

4

0

5.4

-22%

10

22

5

-12

61

2:3

2

0

4.7

-36%

Total

65

104

13

-39

336

10:13

14

3

5.4

-18%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of AGO vs Izako Boars by the Bo3.gg Team

AGO on Inferno Analysis

AGO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AGO on Inferno were snatchie, who contributed 25 kills, and rallen, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10708 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Izako Boars on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Izako Boars, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Izako Boars on Inferno included byali, who contributed 16 kills, and mono, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7724 total damage, Izako Boars couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Izako Boars struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date