AGO Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

24

6

+5

95

1:4

6

0

6.6

+8%

18

24

6

-6

71

3:3

5

2

5.9

-7%

14

25

6

-11

73

6:2

2

0

5.7

-13%

24

24

2

0

62

2:4

5

0

5.7

-2%

20

28

1

-8

63

4:7

6

0

5.4

-20%

Total

105

125

21

-20

363

16:20

24

2

5.8

-7%

fnatic Rising Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

17

6

+9

85

2:2

4

1

7.0

+18%

30

24

4

+6

81

5:2

5

1

7.0

+6%

24

23

8

+1

93

4:6

7

1

6.5

+7%

23

22

7

+1

79

6:3

8

0

6.4

+3%

22

19

7

+3

85

3:3

5

0

6.3

+6%

Total

125

105

32

+20

423

20:16

29

3

6.6

+8%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of AGO vs fnatic Rising by the Bo3.gg Team

fnatic Rising on Inferno Analysis

fnatic Rising demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 33 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for fnatic Rising on Inferno were Banjo, who contributed 26 kills, and WolfY, who added 30 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 13959 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic Rising held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AGO on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AGO, as they managed to secure 14 out of 33 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AGO on Inferno included jedqr, who contributed 29 kills, and phr, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11977 total damage, AGO couldn't prevent fnatic Rising from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, AGO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date