0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP damage (avg/round)
59.921.6
Assists on a map
19.444.3517
Shots (total/round)
8416
Damage (total/round)
51073
Player score (round)
40281012
Damage (total/round)
38473
Player score (round)
46591012
Shots (total/round)
10716
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35471012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
38%
Overpass
27%
Nuke
25%
Vertigo
24%
Dust II
16%
Ancient
7%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
36%
22
14
Overpass
0%
0
38
Nuke
25%
16
13
Vertigo
39%
18
3
Dust II
53%
19
6
Ancient
48%
21
4
Mirage
47%
19
5
Last 5 maps
Inferno
74%
34
2
Overpass
27%
15
12
Nuke
0%
0
27
Vertigo
63%
16
1
Dust II
69%
16
1
Ancient
55%
11
11
Mirage
47%
17
4
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of AGO vs EC Kyiv by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AGO and EC Kyiv, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was leman.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were leman contributed 27 kills and ultimate contributed 30 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14725 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
EC Kyiv analytics
The team EC Kyiv managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for EC Kyiv were s4ltovsk1yy contributed 30 kills and uQlutzavr contributed 23 kills. 13082 of total damage by EC Kyiv could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, EC Kyiv struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments