AGO Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

4

4

+9

113

4:0

2

0

8.4

+46%

15

4

1

+11

88

2:0

3

1

7.8

+40%

14

5

3

+9

80

1:0

4

0

7.3

+39%

10

6

7

+4

101

0:1

2

0

6.6

+23%

10

8

6

+2

69

4:2

2

0

6.5

+6%

Total

62

27

21

+35

451

11:3

13

1

7.3

+31%

AVEZ Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

12

2

-1

76

0:0

3

0

6.4

0%

6

12

2

-6

65

1:4

1

0

4.8

0%

6

12

0

-6

30

1:2

1

0

4.0

0%

3

13

2

-10

32

1:2

0

0

3.4

0%

1

13

5

-12

26

0:3

0

0

3.0

0%

Total

27

62

11

-35

230

3:11

5

0

4.3

0%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of AGO vs AVEZ by the Bo3.gg Team

AGO on Inferno Analysis

AGO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AGO on Inferno were DEPRESHN, who contributed 13 kills, and Svedjehed, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6308 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AVEZ on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AVEZ, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AVEZ on Inferno included FOKUSSS, who contributed 11 kills, and keis, who added 6 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3217 total damage, AVEZ couldn't prevent AGO from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, AVEZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date