Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
16.53.4
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.916.7
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:54s
Player score (round)
35061012
Player score (round)
34971012
Player score (round)
35411012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
18%
Mirage
18%
Ancient
16%
Dust II
13%
Vertigo
13%
Nuke
3%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
38%
24
11
Mirage
47%
15
7
Ancient
45%
20
4
Dust II
53%
19
5
Vertigo
41%
17
3
Nuke
33%
15
12
Overpass
0%
0
35
Last 5 maps
Inferno
56%
16
7
Mirage
29%
17
3
Ancient
61%
18
2
Dust II
40%
15
3
Vertigo
54%
13
14
Nuke
30%
10
8
Overpass
0%
1
29
Info
Match analysis of AGO vs 4glory by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AGO and 4glory, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was leman.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 35 out of 66 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were leman contributed 53 kills and F1KU contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25320 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 24 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
4glory analytics
The team 4glory managed to secure 31 out of 66 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 4glory were Kind0 contributed 46 kills and Impulse contributed 42 kills. 23348 of total damage by 4glory could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 4glory struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments