Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Multikill x-
4
Knife kills
11
AK47 kills on a map
156.5019
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3014
Player score (round)
38501010
Player score (round)
35021010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
38%
Nuke
33%
Ancient
33%
Dust II
21%
Anubis
19%
Inferno
14%
Vertigo
9%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
5
Nuke
17%
6
2
Ancient
8%
13
3
Dust II
33%
9
0
Anubis
50%
20
0
Inferno
47%
15
0
Vertigo
45%
11
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
38%
21
0
Nuke
50%
22
1
Ancient
41%
27
2
Dust II
54%
13
3
Anubis
31%
35
0
Inferno
33%
3
4
Vertigo
54%
13
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ADEPTS vs WOPA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ADEPTS and WOPA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by WOPA. The MVP of this match was Vster.
WOPA analytics
The team WOPA secured 39 out of 68 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for WOPA were Vster contributed 53 kills and sL1m3 contributed 58 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26375 overall damage.
On the defensive side, WOPA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ADEPTS analytics
The team ADEPTS managed to secure 29 out of 68 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ADEPTS were Chuckyy contributed 49 kills and cHeuuuuk contributed 48 kills. 22914 of total damage by ADEPTS could not prevent WOPA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ADEPTS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments