0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
156.4203
USP kills on a map
41.5986
GLOCK kills on a map
51.4516
Speed Round (sec)
00:14s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:17s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
39%
Ancient
21%
Mirage
20%
Anubis
15%
Nuke
9%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
16
0
Vertigo
50%
16
0
Inferno
39%
18
0
Ancient
18%
17
3
Mirage
0%
0
5
Anubis
48%
29
0
Nuke
13%
8
2
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
5
0
Inferno
0%
3
0
Ancient
39%
18
0
Mirage
20%
5
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Nuke
22%
9
0
Info
Match analysis of ADEPTS vs Rounds by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ADEPTS and Rounds, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by ADEPTS. The MVP of this match was SBT.
ADEPTS analytics
The team ADEPTS secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ADEPTS were SBT contributed 23 kills and Tarkky contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9441 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ADEPTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Rounds analytics
The team Rounds managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Rounds were Kollo contributed 19 kills and p12 contributed 15 kills. 8306 of total damage by Rounds could not prevent ADEPTS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Rounds struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments