Ended
Full stats

0 Comments

AURA Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

10

3

+10

91

4:5

7

1

7.5

+33%

17

10

5

+7

91

3:2

3

0

7.1

+25%

15

10

3

+5

65

2:1

5

2

7.0

+13%

15

8

5

+7

78

0:0

3

0

6.5

+20%

13

11

5

+2

50

5:0

3

0

6.2

-8%

Total

80

49

21

+31

375

14:8

21

3

6.9

+16%

X Gamer Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

9

14

5

-5

63

2:3

2

0

5.2

-11%

11

18

2

-7

57

2:2

2

1

5.2

-12%

10

17

3

-7

63

1:3

1

0

4.9

-24%

9

14

3

-5

51

1:1

2

0

4.9

-20%

10

17

2

-7

49

2:5

2

0

4.5

-23%

Total

49

80

15

-31

283

8:14

9

1

4.9

-18%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of AURA vs X Gamer by the Bo3.gg Team

AURA on Inferno Analysis

AURA demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for AURA on Inferno were bobeksde, who contributed 20 kills, and FRANSSON, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8243 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, AURA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


X Gamer on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for X Gamer, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for X Gamer on Inferno included flaw, who contributed 9 kills, and melonhead, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6225 total damage, X Gamer couldn't prevent AURA from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, X Gamer struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date