Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A4 kills on a map
93.6448
USP kills on a map
41.616
USP damage (avg/round)
13.34.6
Decoy grenades thrown
31.291
Player score (round)
37341012
Player score (round)
38181012
Shots (total/round)
9116
Shots (total/round)
8916
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
80%
Vertigo
67%
Mirage
67%
Dust II
50%
Inferno
29%
Nuke
25%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
80%
5
4
Vertigo
0%
0
9
Mirage
67%
3
3
Dust II
50%
6
4
Inferno
29%
7
3
Nuke
75%
8
1
Ancient
0%
1
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
2
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Mirage
0%
0
1
Dust II
0%
2
1
Inferno
0%
1
2
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
2
Info
Match analysis of 9z vs Stone by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 9z and Stone, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Dust II, Overpass, and victory was secured by 9z. The MVP of this match was try.
9z analytics
The team 9z secured 32 out of 52 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Overpass. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 9z were try contributed 44 kills and max contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20794 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 9z held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Stone analytics
The team Stone managed to secure 20 out of 52 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Stone were fusco contributed 29 kills and ABM contributed 29 kills. 16015 of total damage by Stone could not prevent 9z from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Stone struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments