0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
9030
USP kills on a map
61.616
USP damage (avg/round)
16.54.6
Percentage of headshots
41%15%
AK47 kills on a map
176.732
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
8230
Damage (total/round)
38673
Player score (round)
38271012
Player score (round)
36351012
Player's aces
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
83%
Overpass
50%
Inferno
31%
Nuke
27%
Mirage
22%
Ancient
20%
Dust II
4%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
32
Overpass
50%
10
11
Inferno
36%
11
12
Nuke
77%
13
2
Mirage
58%
12
3
Ancient
80%
5
20
Dust II
69%
13
9
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
83%
6
2
Overpass
0%
0
22
Inferno
67%
9
10
Nuke
50%
8
12
Mirage
80%
10
3
Ancient
100%
4
6
Dust II
73%
11
6
Info
Match analysis of 9z vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 9z and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by 9z. The MVP of this match was dgt.
9z analytics
The team 9z secured 14 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps . They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 9z were dgt contributed 27 kills and nqz contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9611 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 9z held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 12 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were chay contributed 23 kills and n1ssim contributed 18 kills. 9239 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent 9z from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments