Anubis
16 - 12
Nuke
19 - 15
9z Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

24

19

9

+5

97

2:1

7

1

7.0

+7%

26

18

7

+8

87

4:1

8

0

6.6

+23%

21

15

5

+6

74

3:4

7

1

6.4

+7%

16

17

9

-1

82

4:3

3

1

6.2

+7%

Total

87

69

30

+18

339

13:9

25

3

6.5

+11%

Sharks Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

17

3

+3

80

1:2

4

1

6.5

+4%

20

23

7

-3

104

1:2

4

0

5.8

+8%

23

39

15

-16

95

4:7

6

1

5.7

-10%

20

18

4

+2

59

4:2

5

0

5.7

-5%

13

21

2

-8

58

5:6

2

0

4.7

-12%

Total

96

118

31

-22

397

15:19

21

2

5.7

-3%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of 9z vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

9z on Anubis Analysis

9z demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for 9z on Anubis were dgt, who contributed 24 kills, and HUASOPEEK, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9492 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, 9z held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Anubis included togs, who contributed 20 kills, and doc, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11112 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent 9z from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date