0 Comments
154
142
41
+12
366
27:19
34
3
Nuke6.3
0%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
36%
Vertigo
29%
Dust II
8%
Ancient
8%
Mirage
5%
Anubis
5%
Nuke
3%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
36%
14
14
Vertigo
0%
1
39
Dust II
75%
8
6
Ancient
55%
20
9
Mirage
50%
20
14
Anubis
52%
21
2
Nuke
53%
19
9
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
33
Vertigo
29%
17
8
Dust II
67%
3
4
Ancient
47%
17
6
Mirage
55%
29
0
Anubis
47%
17
8
Nuke
50%
14
11
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwwl
- wlwlw
Info
Match analysis of 9 Pandas vs PARIVISION by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 9 Pandas and PARIVISION, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by PARIVISION. The MVP of this match was Patsi.
PARIVISION analytics
The team PARIVISION secured 26 out of 46 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PARIVISION were Patsi contributed 39 kills and BELCHONOKK contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16859 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PARIVISION held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
9 Pandas analytics
The team 9 Pandas managed to secure 20 out of 46 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 9 Pandas were d1Ledez contributed 34 kills and shalfey contributed 28 kills. 15575 of total damage by 9 Pandas could not prevent PARIVISION from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 9 Pandas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments