0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
75%
Overpass
74%
Ancient
56%
Mirage
53%
Nuke
50%
Anubis
50%
Inferno
33%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
75%
4
2
Overpass
74%
23
1
Ancient
56%
16
4
Mirage
53%
15
1
Nuke
50%
12
5
Anubis
50%
2
1
Inferno
33%
6
8
Vertigo
0%
1
16
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of 9 Pandas vs Aurora Young Blud by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 9 Pandas and Aurora Young Blud, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Anubis, and victory was secured by 9 Pandas. The MVP of this match was glowiing.
9 Pandas analytics
The team 9 Pandas secured 0 out of 46 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 9 Pandas were glowiing contributed 41 kills and d1Ledez contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18273 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 9 Pandas held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Aurora Young Blud analytics
The team Aurora Young Blud managed to secure 46 out of 46 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 13 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Aurora Young Blud were Easy contributed 34 kills and Hayato contributed 25 kills. 13657 of total damage by Aurora Young Blud could not prevent 9 Pandas from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Aurora Young Blud struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 30 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments