Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 damage (avg/round)
59.325.3
Trades on a map
113.4638
Player score (round)
36111011
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
38431011
Player score (round)
35341011
Shots (total/round)
8316
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
67%
Anubis
59%
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
44%
Nuke
41%
Mirage
37%
Ancient
34%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
4
0
Anubis
0%
1
3
Vertigo
100%
1
3
Inferno
100%
2
0
Nuke
100%
1
2
Mirage
100%
5
0
Ancient
75%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
33%
6
6
Anubis
59%
44
10
Vertigo
50%
4
32
Inferno
56%
16
9
Nuke
59%
44
4
Mirage
63%
30
9
Ancient
41%
39
15
Info
Match analysis of 5W vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 5W and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Dust II, and victory was secured by 5W. The MVP of this match was joel.
5W analytics
The team 5W secured 26 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Dust II. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 5W were joel contributed 51 kills and Thomas contributed 31 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18291 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 5W held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT managed to secure 17 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECLOT were Dytor contributed 38 kills and nbqq contributed 28 kills. 14554 of total damage by ECLOT could not prevent 5W from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments