Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:27s
AK47 kills on a map
226.6606
AK47 damage (avg/round)
88.125.3
USP damage (avg/round)
134.7
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.33.9
Deagle kills on a map
41.6755
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
HE damage (total/round)
11326.5
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
28%
Anubis
20%
Overpass
18%
Ancient
14%
Inferno
12%
Nuke
11%
Vertigo
8%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
31%
16
15
Anubis
40%
15
16
Overpass
40%
20
7
Ancient
42%
38
6
Inferno
50%
14
9
Nuke
50%
12
18
Vertigo
50%
2
45
Last 5 maps
Mirage
59%
46
0
Anubis
60%
5
45
Overpass
22%
9
29
Ancient
28%
39
7
Inferno
38%
16
15
Nuke
39%
28
3
Vertigo
58%
19
16
Info
Match analysis of 500 vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 500 and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by 500. The MVP of this match was Rainwaker.
500 analytics
The team 500 secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 500 were Rainwaker contributed 28 kills and dennyslaw contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8377 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nexus were XELLOW contributed 26 kills and BTN contributed 12 kills. 8004 of total damage by Nexus could not prevent 500 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments