Ended
2
500
2 - 0
ECLOT
Full stats

0 Comments

500 Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

15

5

+8

103

3:1

6

1

7.6

+34%

23

17

5

+6

104

0:2

7

0

7.1

+37%

11

17

6

-6

65

2:1

2

1

5.6

-18%

14

21

3

-7

71

3:4

3

0

5.5

-16%

11

18

4

-7

52

2:5

2

1

5.1

-17%

Total

82

88

23

-6

395

10:13

20

3

6.2

+4%

ECLOT Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

16

4

+12

118

5:0

6

0

8.5

+45%

16

17

10

-1

95

3:4

4

0

6.3

+11%

15

17

4

-2

76

3:2

4

0

6.1

-5%

13

17

9

-4

83

2:3

2

0

5.6

-10%

16

15

0

+1

55

0:1

2

0

5.4

-10%

Total

88

82

27

+6

427

13:10

18

0

6.4

+6%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of 500 vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team

500 on Anubis Analysis

500 demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for 500 on Anubis were CeRq, who contributed 23 kills, and SPELLAN, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9081 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ECLOT on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ECLOT, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ECLOT on Anubis included Dytor, who contributed 28 kills, and kreaz, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9828 total damage, ECLOT couldn't prevent 500 from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date