0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
61.807
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.85.6
AK47 damage (avg/round)
59.625.3
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
42081012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
19%
Anubis
18%
Nuke
12%
Ancient
9%
Mirage
8%
Overpass
1%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
59%
27
4
Anubis
45%
20
23
Nuke
35%
23
23
Ancient
62%
34
7
Mirage
55%
20
21
Overpass
54%
28
8
Vertigo
0%
0
62
Last 5 maps
Inferno
40%
10
14
Anubis
63%
8
7
Nuke
47%
15
8
Ancient
53%
19
1
Mirage
63%
16
4
Overpass
53%
19
9
Vertigo
0%
0
29
Info
Match analysis of 500 vs ARCRED by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 500 and ARCRED, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by ARCRED. The MVP of this match was Patrick.
ARCRED analytics
The team ARCRED secured 39 out of 80 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ARCRED were Ryujin contributed 56 kills and DSSj contributed 54 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28497 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ARCRED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
500 analytics
The team 500 managed to secure 41 out of 80 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 500 were Patrick contributed 60 kills and REDSTAR contributed 56 kills. 30677 of total damage by 500 could not prevent ARCRED from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 500 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments