Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
126.5888
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40373
Player score (round)
42721011
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
GLOCK kills on a map
81.4456
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
55%
Dust II
50%
Mirage
44%
Nuke
31%
Anubis
13%
Inferno
4%
Ancient
4%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
55%
11
16
Dust II
0%
2
1
Mirage
0%
1
46
Nuke
60%
20
2
Anubis
76%
25
1
Inferno
58%
19
5
Ancient
46%
24
13
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
3
49
Dust II
50%
4
3
Mirage
44%
32
6
Nuke
29%
17
16
Anubis
63%
35
7
Inferno
62%
13
31
Ancient
50%
34
4
Info
Match analysis of 3DMAX vs Sampi by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 3DMAX and Sampi, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Dust II, Nuke, and victory was secured by 3DMAX. The MVP of this match was Lucky.
3DMAX analytics
The team 3DMAX secured 46 out of 82 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 3DMAX were Lucky contributed 64 kills and Ex3rcice contributed 51 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 34731 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 3DMAX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi managed to secure 36 out of 82 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sampi were fino contributed 70 kills and manguss contributed 54 kills. 32539 of total damage by Sampi could not prevent 3DMAX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sampi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments