0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
1914.5022
HE kills on a map
21.121
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
AK47 kills on a map
156.5019
AK47 damage (avg/round)
71.525.2
M4A4 kills on a map
73.4454
USP kills on a map
31.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
15.84.8
Molotov damage (total/round)
9623.7
HE damage (avg/round)
12.53.4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
44%
Vertigo
37%
Dust II
31%
Ancient
14%
Anubis
8%
Inferno
7%
Mirage
4%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
41
Vertigo
33%
12
16
Dust II
36%
11
3
Ancient
57%
30
4
Anubis
58%
24
4
Inferno
67%
18
8
Mirage
56%
27
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
44%
18
11
Vertigo
70%
10
16
Dust II
67%
6
14
Ancient
71%
24
5
Anubis
50%
4
37
Inferno
74%
23
1
Mirage
52%
29
5
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of 1WIN vs TSM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 1WIN and TSM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, and victory was secured by TSM. The MVP of this match was Zyphon.
TSM analytics
The team TSM secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TSM were Zyphon contributed 39 kills and acoR contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16484 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TSM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
1WIN analytics
The team 1WIN managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 1WIN were latt1kk contributed 28 kills and neaLaN contributed 25 kills. 12486 of total damage by 1WIN could not prevent TSM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 1WIN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments