0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:19s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Player score (round)
39081010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
50%
Inferno
29%
Ancient
24%
Dust II
20%
Mirage
16%
Vertigo
14%
Anubis
12%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
50%
2
19
Inferno
71%
14
2
Ancient
69%
16
5
Dust II
53%
15
2
Mirage
55%
22
1
Vertigo
14%
7
11
Anubis
38%
13
4
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
2
0
Inferno
100%
6
0
Ancient
45%
11
0
Dust II
33%
3
0
Mirage
71%
7
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
50%
4
0
Info
Match analysis of 1WIN vs PARTIZAN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 1WIN and PARTIZAN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by 1WIN. The MVP of this match was cronuss.
1WIN analytics
The team 1WIN secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 1WIN were cronuss contributed 21 kills and Jyo contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9018 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 1WIN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PARTIZAN analytics
The team PARTIZAN managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PARTIZAN were yakuza contributed 18 kills and 7tetsu contributed 13 kills. 6347 of total damage by PARTIZAN could not prevent 1WIN from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PARTIZAN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments