0 Comments
93
93
30
0
367
13:16
19
1
-2%
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:44s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7730
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
11030
Multikill x-
4
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Info
Map Analysis of 100PG vs Lyngby Vikings by the Bo3.gg Team
Lyngby Vikings on Dust II Analysis
Lyngby Vikings demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Dust II were Daffu, who contributed 25 kills, and raalz, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10639 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
100PG on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for 100PG, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for 100PG on Dust II included smiley, who contributed 20 kills, and icem4N, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10549 total damage, 100PG couldn't prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, 100PG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments