0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.2
6
Ancient0.2
Win Rounds
16
14
Ancient2
Kills
109
78
Ancient31
Damage
11.86K
8.7K
Ancient3155
Economy
644.85K
501.3K
Ancient143550
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
61%
Inferno
59%
Mirage
58%
Vertigo
50%
Dust II
f
45%
Overpass
41%
Nuke
f
17%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
61%
33
7
Inferno
59%
32
15
Mirage
58%
26
24
Vertigo
50%
8
43
Dust II
55%
11
31
Overpass
41%
32
2
Nuke
33%
12
34
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
1
Inferno
0%
0
2
Mirage
0%
1
1
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Dust II
100%
2
0
Overpass
0%
2
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- ll
Info
Match analysis of PROSPECTS vs flowstate by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PROSPECTS and flowstate, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by PROSPECTS. The MVP of this match was 1ll-.
PROSPECTS analytics
The team PROSPECTS secured 0 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PROSPECTS were hype contributed 26 kills and FRANSSON contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11856 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PROSPECTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
flowstate analytics
The team flowstate managed to secure 30 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for flowstate were 1ll- contributed 28 kills and Bels contributed 20 kills. 8701 of total damage by flowstate could not prevent PROSPECTS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, flowstate struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments