0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
71%
Dust II
67%
Ancient
63%
Overpass
47%
Nuke
29%
Mirage
25%
Inferno
20%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
71%
17
5
Dust II
67%
15
13
Ancient
63%
19
6
Overpass
47%
15
1
Nuke
29%
7
20
Mirage
50%
20
7
Inferno
20%
5
22
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
2
8
Dust II
0%
4
0
Ancient
0%
0
11
Overpass
0%
0
8
Nuke
0%
1
5
Mirage
25%
4
10
Inferno
0%
4
3
Last results
Past matches
- lwlll
- lllll
Info
Match analysis of PROSPECTS vs Eternal Fire Academy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PROSPECTS and Eternal Fire Academy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Eternal Fire Academy. The MVP of this match was Wicadia.
Eternal Fire Academy analytics
The team Eternal Fire Academy secured 15 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire Academy were Wicadia contributed 31 kills and cyber contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11234 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Eternal Fire Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PROSPECTS analytics
The team PROSPECTS managed to secure 14 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PROSPECTS were spooke contributed 24 kills and bobeksde contributed 20 kills. 10246 of total damage by PROSPECTS could not prevent Eternal Fire Academy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PROSPECTS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments