0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
31.6107
Galil kills on a map
41.8161
USP kills on a map
31.6107
AWP kills on a map
166.5449
Assists on a map
94.3808
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:54s
Player score (round)
36861011
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
55%
Inferno
42%
Nuke
35%
Vertigo
20%
Mirage
17%
Anubis
3%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
55%
11
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Mirage
64%
14
0
Anubis
40%
10
0
Overpass
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
33
Inferno
42%
12
6
Nuke
68%
25
2
Vertigo
70%
10
10
Mirage
47%
15
9
Anubis
43%
14
12
Overpass
50%
12
9
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of -72c vs TYLOO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between -72c and TYLOO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by TYLOO. The MVP of this match was lyr1cs.
TYLOO analytics
The team TYLOO secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TYLOO were lyr1cs contributed 24 kills and Mercury contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7691 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TYLOO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
-72c analytics
The team -72c managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for -72c were shandarez contributed 18 kills and forz contributed 13 kills. 5364 of total damage by -72c could not prevent TYLOO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, -72c struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments