0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
31.6107
Galil kills on a map
41.8161
USP kills on a map
31.6107
AWP kills on a map
166.5449
Assists on a map
94.3808
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:54s
Player score (round)
36861011
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
55%
Inferno
42%
Nuke
35%
Vertigo
20%
Mirage
17%
Anubis
3%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
55%
11
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Mirage
64%
14
0
Anubis
40%
10
0
Overpass
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
33
Inferno
42%
12
6
Nuke
68%
25
2
Vertigo
70%
10
10
Mirage
47%
15
9
Anubis
43%
14
12
Overpass
50%
12
9
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of -72c vs TYLOO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between -72c and TYLOO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by TYLOO. The MVP of this match was lyr1cs.
TYLOO analytics
The team TYLOO secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TYLOO were lyr1cs contributed 24 kills and Mercury contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7691 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TYLOO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
-72c analytics
The team -72c managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for -72c were shandarez contributed 18 kills and forz contributed 13 kills. 5364 of total damage by -72c could not prevent TYLOO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, -72c struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments