0 Commentaires
70
46
28
+24
413
13:5
19
2
Anubis7.2
+15%
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
126.5019
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.6027
Assistances en moyenne par carte
94.4315
Round rapide (sec)
00:18s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:19s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:24s01:55s
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
71%
Dust II
52%
Ancient
24%
Vertigo
22%
Nuke
13%
Anubis
8%
Mirage
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
0%
0
8
Dust II
25%
4
0
Ancient
33%
3
7
Vertigo
38%
13
0
Nuke
13%
8
3
Anubis
58%
24
0
Mirage
50%
10
1
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
71%
17
0
Dust II
77%
22
0
Ancient
57%
21
2
Vertigo
60%
10
8
Nuke
0%
0
16
Anubis
50%
26
4
Mirage
50%
14
5
Informations
Match analysis of V1dar vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between V1dar and kONO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by kONO. The MVP of this match was Polbandana.
kONO analytics
The team kONO secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for kONO were Polbandana contributed 19 kills and kensizor contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7431 overall damage.
On the defensive side, kONO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
V1dar analytics
The team V1dar managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for V1dar were Alv contributed 14 kills and torox- contributed 10 kills. 5458 of total damage by V1dar could not prevent kONO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, V1dar struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires