0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
16.15.8
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
6329
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
51.6074
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
16.24.7
Score du joueur (round)
43581011
Score du joueur (round)
37421011
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
3
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
73%
Inferno
50%
Overpass
43%
Nuke
39%
Vertigo
25%
Anubis
17%
Ancient
1%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
0
53
Inferno
50%
10
22
Overpass
93%
14
17
Nuke
70%
30
4
Vertigo
42%
19
1
Anubis
56%
25
10
Ancient
64%
22
10
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
73%
11
3
Inferno
0%
1
42
Overpass
50%
8
22
Nuke
31%
16
14
Vertigo
17%
6
19
Anubis
73%
15
4
Ancient
65%
20
5
Informations
Match analysis of SAW vs PERA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and PERA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was story.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were story contributed 53 kills and arrozdoce contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25797 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PERA analytics
The team PERA managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PERA were Porya contributed 51 kills and Ciocardau contributed 39 kills. 23172 of total damage by PERA could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PERA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires