0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Précision des tirs (%)
40%18%
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
93.6448
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
41.6964
Dégâts avec M4A4 en moyenne (par tour)
37.512.7
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
61.6964
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
25.95.4
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.616
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
144.6
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
41.6964
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
19.55.4
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of Sangal vs AGF by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sangal and AGF, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by Sangal. The MVP of this match was imoRR.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal secured 35 out of 59 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sangal were imoRR contributed 47 kills and MAJ3R contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22299 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AGF analytics
The team AGF managed to secure 24 out of 59 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AGF were fr0slev contributed 42 kills and Ryxxo contributed 42 kills. 20479 of total damage by AGF could not prevent Sangal from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AGF struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires