0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.14.6
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.32
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2615.0371
Score du joueur (round)
35591012
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov (total/round)
10023.8
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
9126.8
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of River Plate vs Stone by the Bo3.gg Team
River Plate on Inferno Analysis
River Plate demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for River Plate on Inferno were arieldidi, who contributed 29 kills, and minimal, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11457 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, River Plate held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Stone on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Stone, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Stone on Inferno included ABM, who contributed 23 kills, and rushardo, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10246 total damage, Stone couldn't prevent River Plate from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Stone struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires