0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8171
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.6074
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
21.3023
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
106.5888
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
31.8171
Round rapide (sec)
00:18s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:19s01:55s
Dégâts (total/round)
44873
Score du joueur (round)
41861011
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of Project G vs DUSTY by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Project G and DUSTY, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by Project G. The MVP of this match was Vegi.
Project G analytics
The team Project G secured 26 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Project G were Vegi contributed 35 kills and innocent contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13639 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Project G held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DUSTY analytics
The team DUSTY managed to secure 9 out of 35 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DUSTY were peterr contributed 23 kills and stebbiC0C0 contributed 20 kills. 10186 of total damage by DUSTY could not prevent Project G from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DUSTY struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires