Terminé
1
Basique

0 Commentaires

Dust II
13 - 9
Ancient
22 - 20
Mirage
11 - 13
Anubis
13 - 3
Passion UA Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

MVP

71

59

19

+12

78

10:8

17

3

Dust II5.7

6.6

+9%

72

56

6

+16

84

12:9

18

1

Dust II6.4

6.5

+10%

58

55

19

+3

82

10:9

12

0

Dust II6.7

6.5

+14%

75

63

18

+12

79

10:10

23

2

Dust II5

6.5

+4%

65

65

19

0

76

6:14

18

0

Dust II4.9

5.8

+5%

Total

341

298

81

+43

399

48:50

88

6

Ancient6.1

6.4

+8%

iNation Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

73

62

11

+11

72

12:9

19

3

Dust II5.3

6.2

+4%

61

73

22

-12

74

6:8

16

0

Dust II5.3

5.7

-5%

60

70

14

-10

68

9:6

12

1

Dust II5.3

5.7

-8%

57

63

17

-6

62

18:12

9

1

Dust II5.1

5.5

-11%

47

72

14

-25

58

5:13

10

0

Dust II4.7

5.1

-10%

Total

298

340

78

-42

334

50:48

66

5

Ancient6.1

5.7

-6%

score predict & Analytics Insights
3 - 0
Rés.
3 - 1
3 - 2
2 - 3
1 - 3
0 - 3
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

6.4

5.7

Dust II0.6

Manches gagnées

46

36

Dust II0

Éliminations

296

263

Dust II0

Dégâts

31.66K

29.71K

Dust II0

Économie

2.32M

2.06M

Dust II57050

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

31.6672

Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

116.5888

Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

41.6074

Dégâts en moyenne (par tour)

  •  Anubis

147.21897.4

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Anubis

00:000s01:55s

Dégâts (total/round)

  •  Anubis

52573

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Anubis

36051011

Dégâts (total/round)

  •  Anubis

38273

Dégâts (total/round)

  •  Anubis

87973

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Anubis

43071011

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Choix & interdictions

Il n'y a actuellement aucune information liée à ce choix de cartes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Vertigo

54%

Nuke

50%

Anubis

27%

Ancient

19%

Dust II

17%

Inferno

13%

Mirage

10%

Dernières 5 cartes

Vertigo

54%

39

6

p
p
p
g
g

Nuke

0%

0

47

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Anubis

60%

43

7

g
g
p
p
p

Ancient

59%

64

1

g
g
g
g
g

Dust II

33%

9

6

p
g
p
p
p

Inferno

46%

24

13

p
g
g
p
p

Mirage

57%

46

8

p
p
g
g
g

Dernières 5 cartes

Vertigo

0%

0

6

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Nuke

50%

2

2

g
p

Anubis

33%

6

1

p
p
g
p
g

Ancient

40%

5

3

p
g
p
g

Dust II

50%

6

0

p
p
g
g
g

Inferno

33%

3

0

g
p
p

Mirage

67%

9

0

p
p
p
g
g
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of Passion UA vs iNation by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between Passion UA and iNation, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 3-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, Ancient, Dust II, and victory was secured by Passion UA. The MVP of this match was fear.


Passion UA analytics

The team Passion UA secured 54 out of 99 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient, Dust II. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.


The standout players for Passion UA were fear contributed 71 kills and Jambo contributed 72 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 38121 overall damage.


On the defensive side, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 30 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


iNation analytics

The team iNation managed to secure 45 out of 99 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for iNation were Dragon contributed 73 kills and c0llins contributed 61 kills. 34165 of total damage by iNation could not prevent Passion UA from securing the victory


On the defensive side, iNation struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 23 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date