0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:26s01:26s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:33s01:26s
Assistances en moyenne par carte
124.4098
Score du joueur (round)
34761011
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
9426.4
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1814.6931
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
104.491
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Dust II
50%
Inferno
42%
Nuke
38%
Anubis
37%
Ancient
15%
Mirage
8%
Vertigo
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
0%
1
1
Inferno
0%
0
15
Nuke
38%
16
6
Anubis
70%
23
2
Ancient
74%
43
0
Mirage
50%
24
1
Vertigo
50%
14
2
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
50%
2
4
Inferno
42%
19
7
Nuke
0%
1
37
Anubis
33%
15
20
Ancient
59%
39
3
Mirage
58%
38
1
Vertigo
50%
24
5
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gggpp
- gggpp
Informations
Match analysis of NAVI Junior vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between NAVI Junior and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Anubis, and victory was secured by NAVI Junior. The MVP of this match was cmtry.
NAVI Junior analytics
The team NAVI Junior secured 26 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NAVI Junior were cmtry contributed 36 kills and dziugss contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15639 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NAVI Junior held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint managed to secure 16 out of 42 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Endpoint were MiGHTYMAX contributed 28 kills and CRUC1AL contributed 28 kills. 13773 of total damage by Endpoint could not prevent NAVI Junior from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires