0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
5.4
6.9
Vertigo1.5
Manches gagnées
9
16
Vertigo7
Éliminations
74
100
Vertigo26
Dégâts
8.36K
10.7K
Vertigo2334
Économie
470.5K
561.8K
Vertigo91300
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Dust II
75%
Vertigo
62%
Nuke
58%
Mirage
50%
Inferno
43%
Overpass
27%
Ancient
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
75%
12
4
Vertigo
62%
13
1
Nuke
58%
24
0
Mirage
50%
2
15
Inferno
43%
21
3
Overpass
27%
11
5
Ancient
0%
4
12
Informations
Match analysis of MLRS vs LDLC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MLRS and LDLC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by LDLC. The MVP of this match was Graviti.
LDLC analytics
The team LDLC secured 25 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LDLC were Graviti contributed 25 kills and Brooxsy contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10696 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LDLC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MLRS analytics
The team MLRS managed to secure 0 out of 25 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MLRS were SOKER contributed 18 kills and zibron contributed 19 kills. 8138 of total damage by MLRS could not prevent LDLC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MLRS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires