0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
113
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:32s01:30s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1615.0373
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
4830
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
116.7327
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
61.525.3
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.807
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
19.35.6
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
126.7327
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
116.7327
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Anubis
67%
Mirage
49%
Overpass
41%
Ancient
16%
Nuke
13%
Inferno
10%
Vertigo
5%
Dernières 5 cartes
Anubis
67%
21
2
Mirage
71%
7
34
Overpass
86%
7
37
Ancient
72%
18
13
Nuke
60%
15
6
Inferno
67%
24
12
Vertigo
58%
19
2
Dernières 5 cartes
Anubis
0%
1
34
Mirage
22%
9
18
Overpass
45%
11
11
Ancient
56%
32
0
Nuke
47%
17
0
Inferno
57%
14
4
Vertigo
53%
15
17
Informations
Match analysis of MIBR vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and HAVU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was insani.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 32 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were insani contributed 38 kills and saffee contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17766 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU managed to secure 10 out of 42 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for HAVU were ottoNd contributed 26 kills and Banjo contributed 18 kills. 11342 of total damage by HAVU could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires